James Tague Positioning discussion

the 'firecracker like' pop was the first shot, which was a missed shot at JFK, that came down from the TSBD, over JFK's right shoulder, smashed through the windshield, ricochetted off south Elm, then south Main and wounded Tague. The throat and head shots on JFK all came from the right front of the car (grassy knoll)

• Sam Martin I have to disagree with that conclusion. A bullet bouncing off of Elm Street could never have the velocity or proper trajectory to hit the curb on Main Street, and cause that visual damage to the curb. The trajectory to the curb on Main Street is aligned directly with the Dal-Tex Building second or third floor.

  

  13 hours ago · Unlike · 1
• 

  Frank Roper The trajectory of a bullet also lines up better with a bullet entering kennedy's back and exiting his throat coming from the third floor of the Dal-Tex building. Some say the gun man used a silencer.

  4 hrs · Unlike · 1
• 

  Richard Hooke Frank, the wound to JFK's throat was one of entry.

  1 hr · Unlike · 2
• 

  Richard Hooke Sam, so you are saying a bullet missed JFK, missed, and went all the way down to Main (which does not line up with the Dal-Tex if the bullet did not ricochetted off something else first) and wound Tague? How could the bullet have missed JFK, in the right rear of the car, hit no one or anything else in he car, and made it down to Main? (without LEAPING over the windshield)

  57 mins · Edited · Like
• 

  Jennifer Stone Sam, may think like I thought was James Tague involved with the damage to his cheek. Yet when you read his story you see just a man, who pulled over because his timing was right to get out and see the President. Then you will wonder will who shot him? Was it from the 3 bullets? Well 1 bullet was blind for the gun so their was only 2 bullets possible from the position of the snipers nest. We then look at the lines of mercury within astrology crimes linking to the position where Saul and the position of the Mandarin team was stationed as Roscoe White advised within his diary. Then count the bullets some say 9 some say 11. Well it was more than 2, so we then think about the positions of the gun shots from the grassy knowl.

  48 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Richard Hooke Jennifer, one thing that is not addressed is the shot that nicked Tague was no doubt a missed shot at JFK...for it to have missed reasonably close the only way it could have gone was through the windshield (back to front). LEE OSWALD WAS IN THE DOORWAY SO THERE WAS NO WARNING SHOT (NO TOTALLY WILD SHOT)

  43 mins · Edited · Like · 1
• 

  Richard Hooke and there was an initial BANG and JFK was not yet hit in the throat

  41 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Jennifer Stone Yes, I have thought about this, as the position of James Tague was involved with the positioning from Astrologyincrime website we both end at the same point on many of the crimes so I could see by her piecing the puzzle together that she was positioning the crimes in more a position for the survey to be utilised as how far a bullet can travel to hit James Tague, This is when you line up from the TSDB building, the limosine and James Tague the snipers nest does not fit the position for the shooter which I did write in my book. maybe not so forthright but I did explain the shooter from the LHS of the building as you look at it seemed to be a position where the gun fire and power I allege came from. I did say it was timing with the Umbrella Man and this was from the Grassy Knowl.

  38 mins · Like
• 

  Jennifer Stone For the BANG, I did go into that, it was a bang, and yes JFK was hit to the back of the head however for many of those pictures were resumed by the CIA? Criminal Intelligency Agency. This bang is a major part as it is the signal for the start. I felt it was a littler bullet he was still functioning, you see the hit to the back of the head, JFK's arms go to the back of his head, then to the throat I alleged through looking at the Zapruder and Netfix films and studying the frames one by one and noticing them the file I downloaded showed the same picture for 43 frames. It was like what ever you search the thugs have twisted the evidence.

  36 mins · Like
• 

  Richard Hooke well I don't think he was hit in the back of the head., I agree it was not the sniper's nest; I have concluded they desposited the hulls there and that was it - there was not anyone there. Mac Wallace was behind the third window from the other(west) end...

  34 mins · Unlike · 2
• 

  Richard Hooke I really don't think there was any 'starter bullet' or warning shot

  32 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Jennifer Stone This is where I differ with people on that back shot was the first. This is why my work is novels. However when you finish your work Richard, well for that matter anyone they should put the work to the Attorney General of USA and then with the wordin...See More

  31 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Richard Hooke your input is very important, it's the interchange that makes the progress and will get us there

  29 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Jennifer Stone With the Starter bullet, I felt it was allegedly the bullet shot from Mac Wallace. However in the end I thought it didn't matter who or what had been shot because it was the hidden power of the money trail I had to focus upon to bring about this netwo...See More

  28 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Jennifer Stone I noticed, within the idea of the films being tampered with I googled about confetti. Was confetti around on the 22 November 1963. The answer I got was yes, so my novel came together. The photo is within Suspicious Mind's I sent you Richard.

  27 mins · Like
• 

  Jennifer Stone This photo I put up on a forum, it was David Hex's forum he deleted me so quick I couldn't work out why? Well that photo blows all the evidence I thought, well his work anyway?

  21 mins · Like
• 

  Jennifer Stone I wondered about that photo for months. I have only put it in my novel because of the protection it is a novel yet I do wonder how much the films were all altered to hide the evidence.

  20 mins · Like
• 

  Jennifer Stone The windscreen of the car, I did study, I did write my notes about the windscreen, the shot I felt came from the forward motion to the car and was the positioning of the gun man as to why the third person didn't sit in the front seat of the limousine for the planning, then you look as to who wanted the people moved around it was LBJ.

  14 mins · Like
• 

  Richard Hooke yeah, I really think LBJ wanted Ralph Yarborough to get killed

  12 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Jennifer Stone No, He moved him for a reason, the positioning of the extra person in the limousine for the gun shot through the windscreen would have hit this person and to gain the entry to JFK. This person would have to be moved if it was a worshipping to the god of Moloch they do as the 4th compartment is flour they had flour and 6 people. It did fit linking to the parts of the Bible. Im no Bible basher either, however I do connect because it is research. The limousine I thought was the compartment, this wasn't my first unsolved murder linking to the Moloch compartments I opened the Luna Park Ghost Train fire in Sydney. The links were so real to the number 81, the hidden power linking to alleged Hells Angels which came about in 1948 which co incided with the gaining of the Prescott Bush and the Union Bank. This was where I have been going back in history trying to pick up the evidence to form the significant evidence within my novels as my emails flowed with the co-incidences. Like the 81st floor of the 9/11 tower where all the batteries were and the plane drove straight into. Just a co-incidence? What about the $300 million in gold where most is missing and the evidence is still unsolved all for a reason I just have to find the reason, the co-incidences is what Alex said to note within my research, the more co-incidences, the more patterns we see to bring down the drug network in Australia with evidence. The evidence is the aa for the Holy Graal of the OTO linking to an elite group of the Golden Dawn linking to Rothschild, Crowley, Onassis, the hidden power of the CIA to Australia and Michael J. Hand I noted was to Onassis someone who flew to be with Jackie at a time of need or allegedly to make her believe it was someone? By what I have read Jacky thought allegedly it was LBJ. Shame she didn't wonder about the incident on the plane with her and her two children of a bomb? Onassis gave Jacky paperwork on who did the shooting of JFK it was placed in a safe. Where is the information? Destroyed because it allegedly was a lie.

  1 min · Like
• 

Missing Person Katie O'Shea Coroners Report

INQUEST FINDINGS 12/06/14

Findings required by s. 45 I find that Kathleen Mary O’Shea is deceased. I am required to find, as far as is possible, the medical cause of death, who the deceased person was and when, where and how she came by her death. As a result of considering all of the material contained in the exhibits, I am able to make the following findings.

Identity of the deceased: Kathleen Mary O’Shea How she died: Undetermined Place of death: I find that Ms O’Shea died in the area of the Far North Queensland Tablelands Date of death: Ms O’Shea died on or soon after 29 December 2005. Cause of death: Undetermined

Comments and recommendations: Section 46 of the Coroners Act 2003 provides that a coroner may comment on anything connected with a death that relates to public health or safety, the administration of justice or ways to prevent deaths from happening in similar circumstances in the future.

Comments: All who knew Ms O’Shea described her as a happy, fun-loving and likeable person and, above all, a loving and devoted mother who would do anything for her children. She was much loved by her friends and her family. All were adamant that she would not leave her children for any substantial period without letting them know where she was.

Most of the witnesses stated they had known Ms O’Shea to hitch hike and they wouldn’t be surprised if she had hitch hiked in December 2005 if she needed transport. Ms O’Shea was a person who liked to drink Stout beer although she rarely drank to excess. She led what could be described as an alternate lifestyle. She wore eccentric clothing, she smoked marijuana and was known to have used amphetamine and heroin at times. Some of the witnesses stated that they believed John McKenzie was somehow involved in the disappearance of Ms O’Shea. There is no evidence whatsoever to support that view. There are five possible explanations for Ms O’Shea’s disappearance – firstly, that she intentionally disappeared and does not want to be found, secondly, that she committed suicide, thirdly that she died from natural causes, fourthly that she died from a drug overdose and an unknown person disposed of her body, and finally, that another person caused her death and disposed of her body. There is no reason to believe that Ms O’Shea intentionally disappeared. It is clear from the evidence heard at this inquest that she would not have left her children, on whom she doted. She had never left them for any period of time when they didn’t know of her whereabouts. She has not been seen in Queensland or Melbourne and there is no record of any activity by her since 29 December 2005. There is also no evidence that Ms O’Shea committed suicide. She was not depressed or unhappy. She was enjoying a holiday with some of her children in Ravenshoe, visiting friends and very much looking forward to the birth of her first grandchild. Most significantly, had she committed suicide it is likely that her body would have been located. Ms O’Shea was not suffering from any illnesses to the knowledge of family or friends. If she died of natural causes it is again reasonable to assume that her body would have been found. Ms O’Shea was known to be a user of illicit substances including cannabis, amphetamine and heroin. Shortly before her death she was, according to Alan O’Shea, in possession of ten ecstasy tablets. Alan O’Shea told police that after his mother disappeared he found a number of used syringes in the tent in which she had been sleeping on his property. I have considered the possibility that Ms O’Shea went to Mareeba as planned and there died from an accidental drug overdose and that an unknown person or persons disposed of her body, perhaps to ensure that they would not come to the attention of police. However, this is not a likely scenario. Alan O’Shea drove Ms O’Shea to Atherton on 29 December 2005. He dropped her at a street there and she told him that she was going to the Atherton Hotel to play pool and from there she would go to Mareeba to visit friends. Alan O’Shea then returned home. I am satisfied that Ms O’Shea was last seen by the bottle shop attendant in the bottle shop of the Atherton Hotel that evening. She left there in the company of two men.

There is no evidence that Ms O’Shea was seen anywhere after she left the Atherton Hotel and it is to be expected that, had she travelled elsewhere after being at the Hotel, sightings of her would have been reported.

I find that Ms O’Shea is deceased and she died soon after 29 December 2005 in the area of the Tablelands in Far North Queensland. The cause of her death cannot be determined but it is most likely that an unknown person or persons with whom she came into contact either at the Atherton Hotel or soon after she left there, caused her death and disposed of her body. I close the inquest.

Jane Bentley Coroner Cairns 12 June 2014

A Coroner will today hand down findings on the baffling Katie O’Shea cold case.

Mother-of-five Ms O’Shea vanished after her son Alan dropped her at an Atherton street on December 29, 2005 and an inquest delving into the mystery reopened in a Cairns Coroners’ court yesterday.

An arrest warrant was issued for Alan O’Shea last month after he failed to make contact when the hearing began but the court heard he had still not been in touch, despite an adjournment to allow for him to give evidence.

Mr O’Shea was yesterday named one of several possible suspects during submissions by Counsel assisting the Coroner Stephanie Williams, and Coroner Jane Bentley recalled the arrest warrant.

Today, Ms O’Shea’s former partner John Parmenter told a coronial inquest in Cairns a relative believed a bag of ecstasy, $80,000 and the Russian mafia might be linked to Ms O’Shea’s disappearance.

``But I didn’t know if it was truth or fiction,’’ he told the court, adding he didn’t tell police about the possible link at the time.

What does Sativex do for Cancer? Could it improve all terminally ill patients? Study research

Sativex is the European trade name for a chemical compound called Nabiximol, a pharmaceutical product created only for prescription-based use by GW Pharmaceuticals.

Nabiximol is a chemical compound delivered by oral spray and is often recommended for multiple sclerosis and to control neuropathic pain and spasticity. According to Wikipedia, “The drug is a pharmaceutical product standardised in composition, formulation, and dose, although it is still effectively a tincture of the cannabis plant.” It is a tincture lacking the full spectrum of 60+ cannabinoids found in the cannabis plant, having been refined to contain only a few.

Marijuana is a plant that grows in the ground. If you take the flowers of that plant, dry them out and add nothing to them, you have smokable marijuana. If you take the green, growing leaves, stems and immature flowering buds and run them through a juicer you have raw cannabis juice. The stalk can be used for animal food or ground into high-quality fiber stock.

You can steep the flowers in alcohol, agave or glycerin and create a tincture.  Through heating, chemicals from the flowers transfer into the liquid medium which is then cooled and sipped- or, in the case of Sativex, sprayed. Cannabis tincture is considered to be a medical marijuana product.

Tinctures like Sativex contain the essential components of marijuana and therefore are legally considered to be marijuana.  Yet, it's legal with a prescription.  

Cannabis is NOT a drug it is however a medicinal herb. just like valariana officianialis , dandelion root, echinechia, or any other medicinal herb you can get at your local herbal shop. Cannabis should be properly labeled as such and sold in herbal shops , not taxed to death when it does become legal or labeled medicinal.

However if your a Cancer sufferer and Cannabis Oil with the THC and CBD can not be found.  Then is this a product the Medicial Hospital treatment for cancer for the Terminal Ill should look at the Cannaloids, the structure of the medicine could it help in any way? 

GW Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Sativex;
"Sativex® contains active ingredients called ‘cannabinoids’, which are 
extracted from cannabis plants grown and processed under strictly 
controlled conditions. It is composed primarily of a 1:1 ratio of two 
cannabinoids-CBD (cannabidiol-a non-psychoactive cannabinoid) and THC 
(delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol)"

The possibility that cannabinoids, including endocannabinoids, may treat cancer is supported by an ever increasing body of available evidence. In simple terms, cancer occurs because cells become immortalised; they fail to heed customary signals to turn off growth. A normal function of remodelling in the body requires that cells die on cue. This is called apoptosis, or programmed cell death and this process fails to proceed normally after malignant transformation. As will be discussed in greater detail below, THC, CBD, and perhaps other phytocannabinoids promote the re-emergence of apoptosis so that certain cancer cell types will in fact heed the signals, stop dividing, and die. The process of apoptosis is judged by observation of several phenomena: reduced cellular volume, condensation of nuclear chromatin, changes in distribution of phospholipids in plasma membranes, and cleavage of chromatin into DNA fragments called NDA ladders.

Sativex is an WHOLE PLANT extract. It contains all the cannabinoids, flavonoids and terpenes present in the plants from which it is made. It is pharmacologically identical to cannabis.

"There is no evidence to suggest that Sativex® produces a ‘high’ comparable to recreational cannabis.

One of the cannabinoids in Sativex is THC whereas the other principal
cannabinoid is CBD, a non-psychoactive molecule. Evidence suggests that
CBD may modulate many of the unwanted effects of THC. Hence, through the
incorporation of CBD and the utilization of an oromucosal spray
delivery system which is administered through careful self-titration
(dose adjustment) and which keeps THC from entering the blood too
rapidly, patients are able to obtain symptom relief without experiencing
a 'high'."

http://tinyurl.com/o5dg3ul

However to fight cancer the two ingredients is the THC and CBD oil which I have noted within my blog else where.

Two cannabinoids, not the whole plants worth. Among the missing; Cannabigerols (CBG), Cannabichromenes (CBC), Cannabinol (CBN) and cannabinodiol (CBDL), other cannabinoids (such as cannabicyclol (CBL), cannabielsoin (CBE), cannabitriol (CBT) and other miscellaneous types).

http://tinyurl.com/m3lr3jh

Another method by which tumours grow is by ensuring that they are nourished: they send out signals to promote angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels. Cannabinoids may turn off these signals as well. Finally, cannabinoids may display complex interactions with oncogenes. Pre-clinical studies have highlighted an anti-cancer role for phytocannabinoids via CB receptor and non-CB receptor mediated pathways in a broad spectrum of cancer types bothin vitroandin vivo. 

Within a mouse model of breast cancer, it has been reported that the cannabinoid Cannabidiol (CBD) is able to down regulate the presence of a protein that is elevated in tumoursiand these results have subsequently been replicated in human cancers.  

Cannabinoid receptors (both CB1 and CB2) are present in significantly higher concentrations in many human prostate cancer cell lines.  

http://www.gwpharm.com/oncology.aspx

The cannabinoid-based medicine Sativex is BDS presented as oromucosal spray that results from the combination of THC-BDS and CBD-BDS at a 1:1 (w/w) ratio and to which excipients are subsequently added.

THC but not CBD has been shown to engage cannabinoid receptors to promote tumor cell death.  Now when the patient doesn't have pain, we have to look at the active ingredient.  

Copyright owner Jennifer Weatherstone for the following:  16 June 2014 THC triggers the accumulation of de novo–synthesized ceramide, which leads in turn to stimulation of autophagy and apoptosis.  This would lead me to believe, as I will allege if the mixture was 2:1:1 being the THC is 2 parts it will counteract the high and be more effective on the cell death.  http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/10/1/90.full

We have a medicine now allowed in many countries for cancer.  However they are just looking at the high for pain yet in fact the THC has been noted by Rick Simpson's oil to be the part to fight cancer cells.  

http://www.medicalcannabis.com/indications-for-use/cancer/

Benefits of Cannabis.  http://www.pinterest.com/pin/508203139174239717/  Relating to the THC and CBD.